AI & AGENTS · COMPLIANCE REVIEW AGENT
Turn approval conditions
into a reviewable workflow.
The agent reads approval conditions, drawings, specifications and project documents, then drafts compliance checklists, evidence requirements and risk flags for human review.
- Reads: Conditions, drawings, specs
- Produces: Checklists + risk flags
- Evidence: Matched to requirements
- You confirm: Interpretation and sign-off
Talk to us
TODAY
How this job is done now,
and why it wears people out.
- Conditions are buried in documents: Approval conditions arrive as PDFs and become actions only when someone re-types them.
- Evidence requirements surface late: What must be proven becomes visible when the certifier asks, not before.
- Teams interpret obligations differently: Design and construction read the same condition two ways, and nobody notices until it costs.
- Status is hard to report across projects: Compliance position is compiled by hand, project by project.
- Review depends on memory: The person who read the consent carries the checklist in their head.
HOW THE AGENT TAKES OVER
Trigger → assess → draft → your confirmation.
- Trigger: New approval conditions, drawings or revisions land on a project.
- Assess: The agent extracts obligations, structures conditions and matches documents to requirements.
- Draft: It prepares the compliance checklist and evidence register, flagging gaps and ambiguities.
- Confirm: The compliance lead, planner or PM confirms interpretation and evidence before sign-off.
What goes in.
What comes out.
- What the agent reads: Only what the agreed data boundary allows. (Approval conditions and planning documents; Drawings and specifications; Consultant reports; Site evidence; Existing compliance registers)
- What the agent produces: Drafts your team can judge, never silent decisions. (Compliance checklist, drafted; Evidence register with gaps flagged; Risk flags and review queue; Approval-condition summary; Status inputs for dashboards)
FOUNDATIONS
Built on a system that already runs for real.
The agent extends our compliance & approvals system, in live use inside DDDI Group's development portfolio, and the document intelligence layer whose drawing-review research was presented at WSBE26.
Ships the way every Cyberate agent ships: shadow first, then assisted, then routine, with human confirmation designed in from day one.
The compliance system · Publications & awards
FAQ
Common questions.
Does it replace our certifier or compliance lead?
No. It prepares the checklist and flags issues; your people confirm interpretation and evidence before anything is signed off.
What if a condition is ambiguous?
Ambiguities are flagged and routed to a person. The agent never silently decides what an obligation means.
Can it work across multiple projects?
Yes. Conditions and evidence roll up per project and across the portfolio, the same way the underlying compliance system does.
What data does it need?
Approval documents, drawings and your compliance register, inside an agreed data boundary with role-based access.