Turn approval conditions into a reviewable workflow.
The agent reads approval conditions, drawings, specifications and project documents, then drafts compliance checklists, evidence requirements and risk flags for human review.
The conditions are read once, then carried in someone's head.
Conditions are buried in documents: Approval conditions arrive as PDFs and become actions only when someone re-types them.
Evidence requirements surface late: What must be proven becomes visible when the certifier asks, not before.
Teams interpret obligations differently: Design and construction read the same condition two ways, and nobody notices until it costs.
Status is hard to report across projects: Compliance position is compiled by hand, project by project.
Review depends on memory: The person who read the consent carries the checklist in their head.
Trigger → match → draft → your confirmation.
Trigger: New approval conditions, drawings or revisions land on a project.
Match: The agent extracts obligations, structures conditions and matches documents to requirements.
Draft: It prepares the compliance checklist and evidence register, flagging gaps and ambiguities.
Confirm: The compliance lead, planner or PM confirms interpretation and evidence before sign-off.
Conditions in. A reviewable register out.
What the agent reads: Approval documents, and the project records that are supposed to satisfy them. (Approval conditions and planning documents; Drawings and specifications; Consultant reports; Site evidence; Existing compliance registers)
What the agent produces: A register your compliance lead can sign, with every gap named rather than assumed. (Compliance checklist, drafted; Evidence register with gaps flagged; Risk flags and review queue; Approval-condition summary; Status inputs for dashboards)
It stands on a compliance system running a live portfolio.
The agent extends our compliance & approvals system, in live use inside DDDI Group's development portfolio, and the document intelligence layer whose drawing-review research was presented at WSBE26.
In shadow mode it drafts the register alongside your current process, so you compare the two before it touches a sign-off.
The Cyberate Compliance Review Agent is a construction AI agent that reads approval conditions, drawings and project documents, builds a reviewable compliance checklist with evidence links, and routes every judgement call to your compliance lead.
Does it replace our certifier or compliance lead?
No. It prepares the checklist and flags issues; your people confirm interpretation and evidence before anything is signed off.
What if a condition is ambiguous?
Ambiguities are flagged and routed to a person. The agent never silently decides what an obligation means.
Can it work across multiple projects?
Yes. Conditions and evidence roll up per project and across the portfolio, the same way the underlying compliance system does.
What data does it need?
Approval documents, drawings and your compliance register, inside an agreed data boundary with role-based access.
Know what you owe. Prove it without the archaeology.