SYSTEMS · COMPLIANCE & APPROVALS

Every condition checked.
Every approval tracked.

A compliance system that registers planning conditions and approval obligations against project stages, assigns owners and dates, and keeps the evidence attached where the work happens.

In live use inside DDDI Group's development portfolio, part of the discipline that scaled from 2 to 34 projects.

Tracked against: Project stages
Evidence: Attached at source
Proven across: 2 → 34 projects
Status: Live inside DDDI

Talk to us · See the portfolio deployment

Approvals slip through the gaps between people.

Compliance rarely fails because nobody cared. It fails because conditions live in inboxes, ownership lives in memory, and evidence lives wherever it was last saved.

The delay is measurable: our AUBEA 2025 Best Paper found up to 60% of SA planning approval delays trace to procedural complexity, not the merits of the application.

Conditions in inboxes: Consent conditions arrive as emails and PDFs; whether each one was met lives in someone's memory.
Deadlines surprise you: Approval stages lapse quietly until they become a program problem.
No audit trail: When a certifier or council asks for evidence, assembling it takes days of reconstruction.
Knowledge leaves with people: When the person who handled the consent moves on, the compliance picture moves on with them.

Two disciplines. One defensible
compliance record.

The system splits into a register that makes obligations visible, and an evidence trail that makes them provable.

Condition & Approval Register: Every planning condition and approval requirement, registered where it belongs and visible before it blocks anything. (Conditions registered per project, per stage; Consent pathways read against the actual site, not a generic assumption; Named owners and dates on every approval; Stage-gate visibility across the whole portfolio; Upcoming obligations surfaced while there is time to act): Answers: what do we owe, and by when?
Approvals & Evidence Trail: Documents and sign-offs attached to the condition they satisfy, with the full history kept as work proceeds. (Approval workflow with defined states and owners; Documents attached at the condition and stage they belong to; Full history: who did what, when, with what evidence; Audit-ready retrieval at any time, not after days of digging; Contract obligations fed from the design data layer): Answers: can we prove it, right now?

Conditions in. Status out. Evidence kept.

Capture the conditions: Planning conditions and approval requirements are registered per project and per stage, including in-flight projects brought in with their history.
Track the workflow: Each approval moves through defined states with owners and dates. Nothing sits invisible in an inbox.
Surface what is due: Approaching deadlines and stage blockers become visible before they become program problems.
Keep the record: Documents and sign-offs attach where they belong, ready for certifier, council or audit at any time.

BEFORE & AFTER

The questions compliance actually gets asked.

The question	Without the system	With the system
Was condition 14 satisfied?	Search inboxes, ask whoever remembers	One view, with the evidence attached
Who owns this approval?	Whoever last touched the email thread	A named owner with a date
What lapses next month?	Found out when it blocks the program	Surfaced while there is time to act
Can we survive an audit?	Days of reconstruction	The record already exists

Proven inside a live portfolio.

Compliance tracking is part of the development management discipline that runs DDDI Group's own portfolio. As the portfolio scaled from 2 projects to 34, the same register and evidence trail held: one compliance record per project, visible at portfolio level.

Read Case 01 · Development Management

WHO IT SERVES

If an approval can block your program,
it belongs in here.

Compliance, in plain answers.

Does it replace our certifier or planner?

No. It makes their requirements visible and trackable inside your operation, and keeps the evidence they will eventually ask for.

Can in-flight projects be imported?

Yes. Live projects are brought in with their current conditions and history, so tracking starts from today rather than from zero.

How is evidence stored?

Documents attach directly to the condition or approval they satisfy, with full history. Retrieval is immediate, not an archaeology exercise.

Does it connect to development management?

Yes. Compliance is a native part of the development management discipline running DDDI Group's live portfolio, and integrates the same way in yours.

Where is compliance automation heading?

Toward the drawings themselves. Our research on AI-assisted, drawing-based residential compliance review, integrating large language models and computer vision, was presented at WSBE26 in Melbourne and points at where this system goes next.

Talk to us

Know what you owe.
Prove what you did.

Bring us one live project's consent conditions, and we will show you what a stage-tracked, evidence-attached compliance record looks like for your operation.