FOR MULTI-ENTITY CONSTRUCTION GROUPS
Separate entities.
One controlled group view.
Every company keeps its own books and its own rhythm, while the group sees one live consolidated position across entities, projects and capital.
Where groups lose the picture.
Not inside any one company. In the space between them, where intercompany flows, project costs and reporting cadence stop lining up.
- Each entity tells part of the story: Companies and trusts keep separate records, but management needs one operating position.
- Intercompany visibility is manual: Reconciliation, transfers and shared costs require manual checking, month after month.
- Project and finance data don't align: Delivery teams and finance teams operate from different versions of the truth.
- Reporting consolidates too late: By the time the group report is ready, the decisions it should support have moved.
- Permissions are complex: Different teams need different views without exposing every record to every user.
What groups need visibility over.
Operate, consolidate, report, govern. Each entity has to stay independent while the group still sees one truth across all four.
- Entity-level books
- Project-level delivery data
- Intercompany transactions
- Consolidated reporting
- Permissions and role views
- Group-level exposure and cadence
The operating systems behind
a multi-entity group.
Entity-level control first, group-level visibility second. Neither is worth much without the other.
- Group Finance & PM Platform: Independent entity books, automatic intercompany elimination, one live group view.
- Integrations & Data: Existing accounting stacks connected or migrated through verified stages.
- Reporting & Dashboards: Entity reports and group packs generated from the same live data.
- Scheduling & Procurement: Delivery coordination feeding the same group picture as finance.
- Reporting Agent: Group narratives drafted from consolidated data, approved by people.
What changes when consolidation
stops being a monthly event.
| Before | With the platform |
|---|---|
| Consolidation takes weeks of reconciliation | Automatic and continuous |
| Intercompany matched by hand | Eliminated automatically |
| Group view arrives at month-end | Live, from group to site |
Who works in it.
- Group managing director: One consolidated picture across entities, live.
- Group CFO & entity accountants: Intercompany flows matched and eliminations handled continuously.
- Entity general managers: Their own company's books and projects, intact and independent.
- Project managers: Costs and progress feeding the group view without extra reporting.
- Reporting & admin teams: Reports drawn from live data instead of rebuilt each cycle.
- Board & external accountants: A consolidated position that traces back to source.
Running inside a live
construction group.
Cyberate's group platform runs inside a live multi-company construction group, connecting finances, projects and reporting across the operating structure. Month-end went from a reconciliation marathon to a report that's already there.
- System: Group Finance & PM Platform
- Month-end: The report's already there
- Status: Live
Entity-level control.
Group-level view.
Cyberate does not force every entity into one flat workflow. The platform preserves entity-level control while giving group management a consolidated operating view.
| Level | Who works here | What they see |
|---|---|---|
| Group board | Directors | Consolidated position, exposure and exceptions |
| Group finance | CFO and finance team | Intercompany flows matched, eliminations handled |
| Entity | Entity managers | Their own books, projects and obligations |
| Project | Project managers | Costs and progress posting into the group picture |
| Site | Site admins | The day's work, feeding everything above |
Common questions.
What does Cyberate build for construction groups?
Cyberate builds multi-entity group finance and project management platforms with automatic consolidation, intercompany handling and role-based reporting, running live for an Australian construction group.
Can each entity keep separate books?
Yes. Independence per entity is the design: separate records on a shared chart-of-accounts discipline, consolidated automatically.
Can permissions be controlled by role or company?
Yes. Site, company and group views are permission-tiered, so each team sees exactly its scope.
Can existing accounting systems remain in place?
Usually yes. Integration is the default, migration only through verified stages where it genuinely serves the group.
Does the group view include delivery data as well as finance?
Yes. Project costs, milestones and delivery status post into the same consolidated picture as the books.
Keep the entities. Lose the
month-end reconstruction.
Bring us your structure: the companies, the trusts, the accounting tools and the reporting obligations. We will show you what consolidates automatically and what needs a rule agreed first.