FOR MULTI-ENTITY CONSTRUCTION GROUPS
Every company keeps its own books and its own rhythm, while the group sees one live consolidated position across entities, projects and capital.
Not inside any one company. In the space between them, where intercompany flows, project costs and reporting cadence stop lining up.
Operate, consolidate, report, govern. Each entity has to stay independent while the group still sees one truth across all four.
Entity-level control first, group-level visibility second. Neither is worth much without the other.
| Before | With the platform |
|---|---|
| Consolidation takes weeks of reconciliation | Automatic and continuous |
| Intercompany matched by hand | Eliminated automatically |
| Group view arrives at month-end | Live, from group to site |
Cyberate's group platform runs inside a live multi-company construction group, connecting finances, projects and reporting across the operating structure. Month-end went from a reconciliation marathon to a report that's already there.
Cyberate does not force every entity into one flat workflow. The platform preserves entity-level control while giving group management a consolidated operating view.
| Level | Who works here | What they see |
|---|---|---|
| Group board | Directors | Consolidated position, exposure and exceptions |
| Group finance | CFO and finance team | Intercompany flows matched, eliminations handled |
| Entity | Entity managers | Their own books, projects and obligations |
| Project | Project managers | Costs and progress posting into the group picture |
| Site | Site admins | The day's work, feeding everything above |
Cyberate builds multi-entity group finance and project management platforms with automatic consolidation, intercompany handling and role-based reporting, running live for an Australian construction group.
Yes. Independence per entity is the design: separate records on a shared chart-of-accounts discipline, consolidated automatically.
Yes. Site, company and group views are permission-tiered, so each team sees exactly its scope.
Usually yes. Integration is the default, migration only through verified stages where it genuinely serves the group.
Yes. Project costs, milestones and delivery status post into the same consolidated picture as the books.
Bring us your structure: the companies, the trusts, the accounting tools and the reporting obligations. We will show you what consolidates automatically and what needs a rule agreed first.
Talk with our team · The group platform system · Group finance platform for construction