PROJECT DELIVERY · MATERIALS & LABOUR
Materials and crews,
finally on the same page.
Site progress drives material demand and crew rosters together: deliveries, quantities and people coordinated in one view.
Running for an internal-walls contractor: materials, crews and site progress coordinated in one view.
Site progress, deliveries and crew assignment on one programme. The phase structure is the real one used on live jobs.
- Coordinates: Materials + crews
- Driven by: Site progress
- Scope: Parallel sites
- Status: Live deployment
Coordinated by phone. Paid for in downtime.
- Materials without crews: Stock arrives on site with nobody scheduled to install it.
- Crews without materials: Teams turn up to sites where the delivery hasn't, and the day is lost.
- Margins eaten quietly: Idle time and repeat deliveries never show up on one report, but they compound across every site.
One view links progress, materials and people.
- Track site progress: Each site's stage drives what's needed next: materials and labour alike.
- Link demand to rosters: Material deliveries and crew assignments are scheduled together, not separately.
- Coordinate across sites: Multiple parallel sites share one coordination view, so conflicts surface before they cost a day.
- Flag the mismatches: A delivery without a crew, or a crew without materials, is flagged in the office before the day is lost on site.
One decision instead of two phone calls.
- Progress-linked material demand: Each site's stage tells the system what's needed next, and how much.
- Crew rostering tied to deliveries: People and materials are scheduled as one decision, not two phone calls.
- Delivery timing and quantities: The right stock lands in the window the rostered crew can use it.
- Multi-site coordination: Parallel sites share one view; the same office team runs more of them.
- Scheduling Agent on top: When plans change, the agent proposes the re-shuffle across sites.
IN LIVE DEPLOYMENT
Running for a real trade contractor.
Built for an internal-walls contractor: mismatches between crews and materials are flagged before they cost a day, and the same office team coordinates more parallel sites.
| Before | With the system |
|---|---|
| Materials wait on site for a crew | Deliveries land to a rostered crew |
| Crews lose days to missing stock | Days are planned against confirmed deliveries |
| Coordination by phone, from memory | One shared view across every site |
- Used by: Internal-walls contractor
- Coordinates: Crews, materials, sites
- Status: Live
Site reality in.
A day that works out.
Stock and delivery systems stay where they are. What crosses the boundary is agreed before anything connects.
- What the system reads: The signals that decide whether tomorrow works. (Data in) (Site progress by stage; Crew rosters and availability; Material quantities and stock; Delivery timing)
- What it gives back: Crews, materials and sites lined up before the day starts. (Outputs) (Coordinated day plans per site; Crew-material mismatch flags; A multi-site coordination view; Change knock-on visibility)
Common questions.
How do site crews interact with it?
Simply: progress updates and rosters, not paperwork. The office sees the coordination view.
Can it handle subcontracted crews?
Yes, internal and subcontracted teams can both be rostered against site demand.
What about suppliers?
Delivery coordination extends to supplier timing. See Procurement for the full supplier workflow.
Tomorrow settled tonight,
not at the site gate.
Bring us a week where crews and materials did not line up. We will walk through what the system would have flagged, and when.